California Unveils Preliminary Draft Regulation For A Cap-And-Trade Program As One Of The Main Strategies To Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions That Cause Climate Change

by Taraneh Fard & Olivier Theard

On November 24, 2009, the California Air Resources Board unveiled its proposed draft regulation for a greenhouse gas ("GHG") cap-and-trade program in its effort to put California on the path to achieve the mandate imposed by Assembly Bill 32 ("The Global Warming Solutions Act") of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, and ultimately achieving an 80% reduction from 1990 levels by 2050. The cap-and-trade strategy is a proposed solution that is intended to provide the certainty that GHG emission reductions will be achieved by setting emission goals, while offering the needed flexibility in reaching those goals through the creation of tradable permits. In other words, the "cap" is a legal limit on the quantity of greenhouse gases that a particular region can emit each year and the "trade" means that companies may swap among themselves the permission—or permits—to emit greenhouse gases. Release of the preliminary draft regulation marks the beginning of the next phase of the cap-and-trade rulemaking, culminating in the California Air Resources Board's consideration in 2010 of the first broad based cap-and-trade program in the nation.  The rule will be in effect by January 1, 2012.
 

Continue Reading...

Federal Courts Take Divergent Views of Common Law Claims on Climate Change

Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, __ F.3d __, No. 07-60756 (5th Cir. 2009); Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation, No. 08-1138 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 30, 2009)

by James F. Rusk

In two sharply diverging opinions, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and a northern California district court recently considered the validity of common law tort claims against large emitters of greenhouse gases. The Fifth Circuit, in Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, held that plaintiffs had standing and that their claims did not present a nonjusticeable political question. The district court, in Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation, found that plaintiffs lacked standing because their injuries were not traceable to defendants' actions, and that their claims were barred by the political question doctrine. 
 

Continue Reading...

Summary of "Green" Legislation for the 2009 California Legislative Session

by Daniel P. Bane

At the end of the 2009 legislative session, Governor Schwarzenegger signed a remarkable potpourri of "green" legislation into law. While some of these measures are new edicts, others supplement or amend existing statutory schemes in hopes of catalyzing swift growth in the area of private renewable energy generation to help California achieve its ambitious clean energy goals as well as the goals of the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Health & S C §§ 38500-38598 ("AB 32"). Specifically, this article addresses the following recent bills signed by the governor: SB 32, AB 920, AB 758, SB 104, AB 881, and AB 1366.
 

Continue Reading...
Tags: