The Use and Misuse of Motions to Stay and Project in CEQA Litigation

The mere filing of a lawsuit under the California Environmental Quality Act does not automatically halt an approved project.  In fact, the act mandates that responsible agencies "shall assume" compliance with the law and act accordingly unless ordered by a court to halt project activity. Project developers therefore often proceed at their own risk with project construction in the face of a pending challenge based on the act.

The following article by Arthur Friedman was originally published in the California Real Estate Journal. To read the article please click here.

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Neither the content on this blog nor any transmissions between you and Sheppard Mullin through this blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers.

By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.